Technical Due Diligence

A clear-eyed assessment of what you are really buying or investing in: codebase health and technical debt, architecture and scalability, security and data-handling exposure, infrastructure cost, team and key-person risk, and whether the AI and IP claims are real or just marketed — all mapped to the language of the deal.

It depends on the size of the target and the depth the deal needs, but it is built to fit deal timelines. You get a report written for investors and deal teams — not just engineers — with red, amber and green risk flags tied to the terms.

Yes. Going through your own stack before investors or acquirers do lets you fix the obvious flags, prepare honest answers, and avoid nasty surprises in the room. It is one of the highest-return things a founder can do before a raise or exit.

Every finding is translated into deal terms — what is a real risk to price or walk on, what is a fixable post-close item, and what integration or remediation should be prioritised. You get a findings call with your deal team to work through it.

The people who built it are the last people who can objectively assess its risk. An independent technical read — from someone who has delivered and audited hundreds of systems — is exactly what protects the cheque.